As part of our ongoing campaign to get rid of the shameful label that is "CFS" I have posted a short "tooltips" essay on the front of Stonebird :
I will carry on campaigning , in my own way, to get rid of CFS, no matter the practical issues.
I was part of the Learning Difficulty/Mental Health , People First/Survivors Speak out movement back in the 80's; this coincided with the closure of the large mental hospitals and asylums; I witnessed , at first hand, how very meaningful and extraordinarily powerful it is for people to take their power back - and how much names and labels mean.
When I trained as Nurse, my qualification was "Registered Nurse for People who have a Mental Handicap." Today, not that many years later, "mental handicap" us just so inappropriate, the correct term to use is " Learning Difficulties".
A while ago, those same human beings were being classed as "Idiots", "Imbeciles" , "Morons" or "Cretin"( from the French for Christian : Christ-like), terms that were slowly replaced by the much more "enlightened "Retarded" in the 1960s.
"Spastic" is no longer an appropriate label for someone who has Cerebal Palsy. Still the Spastic Society was going strong until recently and who calls someone with Down Syndrome a "Mongol" anymore ?
"CFS", like so many labels before it, has now become the most derogatory term; it is high time people with ME take their power back and get rid of it.
The medical profession have lrealy let people down by their use of the term CFS , by not speaking up loudly enough - by caling it a "Syndrome" rather than a disease.
Much better if everyone called it Myalgic Encephalomyelitis - its proper, true name.
I am spurred on through my involvement locally, with the NHS. I have been profoundly shocked at the across the board disdain of people labelled as having "CFS" : rarely is the term "ME" used and the talk, at the highest levels here is about Wessely and the "gold standard" that are the Oxford Criteria
What about all those CFS papers that have been published ?? Those authors frankly have let us down, using the wrong name.
What about all those papers on Mental Handicap ? What about my own qualification ? What about all that published research on the "feeble minded" ?
You move on; that's all. In the history of human services, that is the way progress happens. You make a stand for the truth and move on from a clearer place.
Joint Commisioning Panel for Mental Health has recently published
for commissioners of services for people with medically unexplained
symptoms, specifically listing Myalgic Encephalomyelitis as a "Functional Somatic Disorder". This
is not the first time that an incorrect reclassification has been
attempted. In October
attempt was made to have ME ‘unofficially’
reclassified, as a mental disorder in a U.K adaptation of a WHO
publication, the ‘WHO Guide to Mental Health in Primary Care’, developed by the Collaborating Centre of the Institute of
Psychiatry, London and included under the classification F48.0
After a reprimand from the WHO, an erratum was eventually issued,
acknowledging that the
anyone wishing to challenge this report, the following may be of
Encephalomyelitis (ME) has
by the World Health Organisation since
as an organic neuro…
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, a neurological disease with multi-system dysfunction is continuing to
disappear from view, lost in a fatigue focus that does not
clinically represent the reality of this severely disabling chronic disease.
There should, you would think, be no compromise on identifying and separating Myalgic Encephalomyelitis from other conditions and recognising the
need for a full medical service with a biomedical pathway, for people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME).
This is sadly not the case and that has profound implications for those people who have ME especially the most severely affected, who are so isolated as to be almost
invisible to health services, social services and society generally, too ill to engage with them.
It is unlikely that anyone outside the situation really know what life is like for people with Severe and Very Severe ME, who
are house and or bed bound, unable to interact in a normal way and separated from ordinary life by acute environmental hy…
There is an urgent need to develop an appropriate model of practice for patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME). Crawford, Aitken and McCagh (2008) found that nurses still respond more positively to patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Rheumatoid
Arthritis than patients with ME, which they are more likely to wrongly view as a psychological disorder. Nurses are not being educated in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, making it difficult for them to recognise the mistreatment of ME and also making it unsafe for patients with ME to be exposed to a hospital/ medical environment. A 2009 study (Chew-Graham et al ), for example, found little evidence that Nurses are being taught about ME. One person stated that: “ people probably just look at them and think, oh you know he's just tired all the time: lazy...lazy bastards and wasting doctor's time.'” A study of the literature reveals an alarming lack of awareness of the seriousness of the disease. Without the appropriate understand…