Rightly outraged.
25% Group/Stonebird
response to “Rehabilitative therapies for chronic fatigue
syndrome: a secondary mediation analysis of the PACE trial”
Greg Crowhurst,
Simon Lawrence
People with Severe ME
are rightly outraged by the latest in a long line of
misrepresentative articles suggesting that their disease is a fatigue
condition.
People are suffering
and have been suffering for decades as a result of the misdirection
of ME away from a WHO defined neurological disease.(Hooper et al
2007) It is surely time for this to end.
The so-called
"psychiatric lobby" have for many years perpetuated the
untruth that ME is a "non disease", a somatoform disorder,
maintained by abnormal or unhelpful illness beliefs, condemning
patients to decades of neglect, abuse, misunderstanding and
mistreatment. It is time that Myalgic Encephalomyelitis is
recognised as the serious neurological disease it is and separated
once and for all from a sea of ill-defined, vague, misrepresentative
fatigue, under psychiatric influence.
The latest paper,
(Chalder et al 2015) grotesquely reported in the media, has caused
immense distress; echoed around the world the article is given far
more authority than it deserves, thus perpetuating a global knock on
effect, that will have a devastating negative influence especially
for the most ill.
Its central “morally
indefensible (Weir 2015)” premise that ME patients are afraid of
activity and would benefit from Graded Exercise Therapy and Cognitive
Behaviour Therapy, to cure their phobia, ignores the evidence that
people with ME are physically harmed by exercise (Crowhurst 2010,
Kindlon 2011, VanNess 2014).
The key issue here is
the wide and loose definition used to identify the research cohort
and the misuse of the name ME to mean CFS, moving the focus and
ground away from ME, a neurological disease, to Chronic Fatigue, a
mental health condition. Whether ME patients are included or not,
within the patient cohort, the potential for harm from wrong
treatment is huge. Patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis need
protecting from the dangers of misinterpretation.
The 25% Severe ME Group
and Stonebird call for psychiatry to be removed from first line
involvement in ME, for a much clearer definition to be applied across
the board to separate ME from CFS, for the development of a
biomedical, not a psychosocial pathway and for high end Myalgic
Encephalomyelitis not “CFS” research .
A whole new approach to
addressing the medical needs of people with Severe ME, which
recognises the complexity of hypersensitivity, must be developed,
alongside a long overdue medical centre of excellence.
Chalder T, Goldsmith
KA, White PD, Sharpe M, Pickles AR.
Rehabilitative
therapies for chronic fatigue syndrome: a secondary
mediation analysis
of the PACE trial. Lancet Psychiatry 14 Jan 2015,
doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00069-8..
Crowhurst G (2010) 101
Good Reasons:
Why it is wrong to
provide CBT and GET to ME Patients.
Hooper M, Marshall E,
Williams M (2007) CORPORATE COLLUSION?
http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/Corporate_Collusion_2.htm
Kindlon T (2011)
Reporting of Harms Associated with Graded Exercise Therapy and
Cognitive
Behavioural Therapy
in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Bulletin of
the IACFS/ME. 2011;19(2): 59-111
http://www.iacfsme.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Rd2tIJ0oHqk%3D
VanNess M (2014)
'Exercise and ME/CFS' at Bristol Watershed. Part
One.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_cnva7zyKM
Comments
Post a Comment