Three reasons why Labour's hands are red with the blood of the disabled and the sick.
Will Jeremy Corbyn
apologise for the pogrom it unleashed while in power, culminating in yesterday's announcement that nearly 90 people a
month are dying after being declared fit for work ?
Corbyn has called for Iain
Duncan Smith's resignation.Yet the Orwellian
chain of events that led to yesterday's tragic announcement was devised and set
in place by Labour.
Here are three
reasons why Labour's hands are stained red:
1. It was Labour
that introduced the Work Capability Assessment
Before the Coalition
and the current Conservative government came to power seriously ill
and disabled people , found fit for work under Labour were denied
Employment Support Allowance (ESA) and then subsequently written
off, just left to cope with greatly reduced benefits on Job Seekers
Allowance and little support. (Source : Not Working . CAB Evidence on
the WCA.)
That is because they
had all been subjected to the notorious Work Capability Assessment
(WCA) which took little account of variable symptoms, generalized
pain, exhaustion or the underlying seriousness of a person’s
condition.
Yet introducing ESA
and the WCA in 2007, deemed fatally flawed , last year, by the Work
and Pensions Select Committee, (W&P 2014), Labour described them as “A new, progressive vision .” (Hain P 2007)
2. It was Labour
that introduced the biopsychosocial approach
Labour’s
extraordinary counterintuitive reasoning , towards disability, had
its roots, says Jonathan Rutherford in the American right’s
philosophy that the poor are the cause of their own poverty because
they fail to take advantage of the opportunities “available” to
them..
It all began in 1994
when the Conservative Government brought in UNUM, the giant American
Medical insurance Company, to advise them on welfare reform, a member
of that group was Mansel Aylward, who in 1999, as Chief Medical
Officer at the DWP, devised the new Personal Capability Assessment
(PCA), contracted out to the American Corporation Atos Origin, who used a
computer system, Logical Integrated Medical Assessment (LIMA), which
neatly side steped any inconvenient medical opinion (syzygysue 2014),
where the ” emphasis was no longer on entitlement, but on what
a person is capable of doing.”
The intellectual
basis behind the PCA was UNUM’s “The Scientific and Conceptual
Basis of Incapacity Benefits “ (SCBIB) by Gordon Waddell and
Mansel Aylward followed by the 2006 report: Is work good for your
health and well-being by Gordon Waddell and Kim Burton which are
based upon the biopsychosocial model of illness, designed to
“liberate” the disabled from the ” medical model” . According
to the biopsychosocial model, under which untold tens of thousands of
people, especially people with ME whose physical illness is almost
completely denied and psychiatric treatment is the only treatment on
offer , have suffered horrible abuse and even death.
The biopsychosocial
model that Labour introduced was based upon the premise that ”
Disease is the only objective, medically diagnosable pathology.
Sickness is a temporary phenomenon. Illness is a behavior social
phenomenon rather than a health problem. The solution is not to cure
the sick, but a “fundamental transformation in the way society
deals with sickness and disabilities. ”
The transformation
is this : ” Sickness is a social and cultural phenomenon rather
than a health problem. The solution is not to cure the sick, but to
transform the culture of welfare. No one who is ill should have a
straightforward right to receive benefit.”, this extreme agenda
” was adopted by the former banker that Labour brought in, David
Freud , now Lord Freud .
Pushing the
neoliberal agenda that Labour pioneered to triumphant heights, ever
since, the Coalition and the Conservatives have progressed some of the
toughest, and most regressive social policies since the foundation of
the welfare state. Building upon the “dependency-busting”
foundation laid down by New Labour, never before has there been such
a concerted onslaught on disabled/sick people, in terms of New
Labour's distinction, entirely devoid of evidence, between the
“deserving and undeserving poor”.(Roulstone )
Both the neoliberal
politician and the private health insurance want to shrink the State,
reduce public expenditure via privatisation and remove people from
benefit entitlement . (Syzygysue 2011)
3. It was Labour
that labeled the sick and disabled as “malingerers ”
It was a New
Labour conference in November 2001 entitled Malingering and
Illness Deception , together
with their 2006 Green Paper: A New Deal for Welfare:
empowering people to work – an independent assessment of the
arguments for the proposed Incapacity Benefit reform that is
responsible for the mind set that continues to this day :
‘malingering’ as being the motivation for claimants of
disability benefits. (Stewart 2015)
In effect the DWP's
agenda, ever since, has been motivated towards denying ‘illness’
and associated legitimate need, wherever possible. (Syzygysue 2011)
This is despite the fact that all evidence supports the fact that,
out of the entire DLA budget, less than 0.5% were bogus applications
with 1.5% admin error. (Stewart M 2012)
As Laurie Pennie
(2012) writes the consequent attack upon the disabled and sick has
come from all fronts from “the financial to the moral –
rewriting the social script in this country so that the needy are no
longer full human beings with just as much right to a life as anyone
else, but parasites, scroungers, burdens on the state, barely even
human.
“http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2012/11/sick-and-tired-coalitions-war-disabled-and-destitute
Last Year a
Conservative Welfare Minister suggested that disabled people should
work for £2.00 an hour. (Morris 2014)
The consequences of
the Coalition's policies have been terrible, with the disabled
bearing the brunt of cuts. Benefits for disabled people and the
poorest , this year, will have been cut by £18 billion, a cut of
about 20%. (Duffy 2013)
In 2013 Amnesty
International UK condemned this “regressive and lethal assault on
our rights” (Left Foot Forward 2013).
Previous DWP
mortality figures showed that 10, 600 people died in eleven months
in 2011.(Pring 2015). The figures,
released yesterday show 2,650 former claimants of sickness-related
benefits died within six weeks of being declared “fit for work”
between December 2011 and February 2014.
My
wife, who
has Very Severe ME,
has
been chronically
sick and disabled for
over two decades. Last
time we spoke to a Labour Party member, back in 1995, he
informed us
that
90% of the sick and disabled are scroungers.
The carnage
continues.
Greg Crowhurst
References :
Duffy S (2013) A
fair society? How the cuts target disabled people
http://www.centreforwelfarereform.org/uploads/attachment/354/a-fair-society.pdf
Hain P (2007) Labour
and the sick note
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2007/11/work-benefit-welfare-tories
Left Foot Forward
(2013)
http://leftfootforward.org/2013/04/amnesty-international-condemns-coalition-assault-on-disabled/
Morris N (2014)
Lord Freud: Tory welfare minister apologises after saying disabled
people are 'not worth’ the minimum wage
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/lord-freud-tory-welfare-minister-accused-of-claiming-disabled-people-are-not-worth-the-minimum-wage-9796062.html
Penny L ( 2012)
Laurie Penny on the coalition’s war on the disabled and
destitute
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2012/11/sick-and-tired-coalitions-war-disabled-and-destitute
Pring J (2015) DWP told to publish ESA deaths report, after two-year delay http://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/dwp-told-to-publish-esa-deaths-report-after-two-year-delay/
Roulstone A
Coalition Disability Policy-A Consolidation of Neo-Liberalism or
Benign Pragmatism?
http://www.social-policy.org.uk/lincoln2011/Roulstone%20P4.pdf
Stewart M (2012)
DWP/UNUM/ATOS SCANDAL ~ ‘WELFARE REFORM – REDRESS FOR DISABLED
PEOPLE’
http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/2012/09/08/dwpunumatos-scandal-welfare-reform-redress-for-disabled-people-report-by-mo-stewart-wraf-rtd/
Stewart M (2015)The
influence of private insurance on UK welfare reforms
http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2015/01/20/the-influence-of-private-insurance-on-uk-welfare-reforms-mo-stewart/
syzygysue (2011)
Welfare reform and the US insurance giant
Unum.http://think-left.org/2011/11/22/welfare-reform-and-the-us-insurance-giant-unum/
W&P 2014: ESA
needs fundamental redesign, says MPs: July 2014
DWP Work &
Pensions Select Committee 23rd July 2014: News release
syzygysue(2014)
Welfare Reform and ME/CFS
http://think-left.org/2011/08/04/welfare-reform-and-mecfs/
Wow. Well done, Greg.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much Mary !! What I haven't conveyed is how this process of denial and the labeling of the sick and disabled as "malingerers" cut its teeth on people with ME : where a whole disease has been written off. If only the process was widely understood nobody could take the psychiatric lobby seriously.
ReplyDeletePeter Lilley, a cabinet minister in the Thatcher Government started this disgraceful UK public policy ball rolling and then Blair and Brown's "New Labour" government from 1997 well and truly ran with that ball. Greg Crowhurst's 'Three reasons why Labour's hands are red with the blood of the disabled and the sick' is a timely reminder of the complicity of New Labour in the long-running saga of ME patient abuse in our country via official UK policy. A useful overview of such policy is available at:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.angliameaction.org.uk/docs/Williams-UK-Government-Strategy-for-CFS-ME.pdf
Anglia ME Action
Thanks for spelling out the "truth" so comprehensively Greg. A family member, also severely affected by ME in past years has refused to even process any state benefit entitlements because of a refusal to engage with the humiliation, degradation, idiocy, repeated cock ups by Job Centre Plus, DWP, ATOS, maladministration, misdirection throughout, the intragegency of call centre staff reading from the set "scripts", having the phone put done on them mid sentence, the blatancy of their lies over mistakes, the failure to even follow their own manuals and policy documents many of which they are unaware of or in denial of, the failure to carry out Harrington Review recommendations, the failure to comply with the laws on Advocacy arrangments; the above all point to failure of Human Rights...... But don't bother with invoking the Human Rights Act as it has been highjacked by criminals and other exploitative individuals who cite such nonsense as development land refusal to build as a breach of their " quiet enjoyment " of their land and making lots of money despite potential harm to the environment!
ReplyDeleteThe law in this country is no better and an advocate friend has just lots his first benefit tribunal case in 3 years, a sign of where things are going with the judiciary.
My friends daughter aged 35 with ME and fibromyalgia will be cremated in York this Friday. She had years of battle with health and benefits. She had consequent complications which proved fatal Friday before last. She had spent her last summer helping to raise funds for MERUK.......whilst undergoing intense chemotherapy.
She had been fobbed off with "It's only your ME....". Rest in peace Josie.
I have been forced to take forward a judicial challenge myself on environmental and planning matters.......so I too am at the mercy of the law. Wish me luck! Rant over benefit!
So good to hear from you Barbara ! What a brilliant, biting, poignant account of the lies, misdirection, maladministration that is the "welfare" system. The neglect of people, especially with ME, is off the scale. As you know Linda, my wife, has lived a tormented, agonising existence with no proper medical help or input,for more than tow decades now. It is an unspeakable tragedy to hear about your friend's daughter , someone so young with such commitment.Good to hear you are still campaigning Barbara. Good luck.
DeleteMuch love xxx