Why ME must be removed from the JCPMH Report : Guidance for Commissioners of Services for People with Medically Unexplained Symptoms
The
Joint Commisioning Panel for Mental Health has recently published
"Guidance
for commissioners of services for people with medically unexplained
symptoms,
specifically listing Myalgic Encephalomyelitis as a "Functional Somatic Disorder".
specifically listing Myalgic Encephalomyelitis as a "Functional Somatic Disorder".
This
is not the first time that an incorrect reclassification has been
attempted. In October
2001 an
attempt was made to have ME ‘unofficially’
reclassified, as a mental disorder in a U.K adaptation of a WHO
publication, the ‘WHO Guide to Mental Health in Primary Care’, developed by the Collaborating Centre of the Institute of
Psychiatry, London and included under the classification F48.0
“Unexplained
medical symptoms.”
After a reprimand from the WHO, an erratum was eventually issued, acknowledging that the wrong classification.
After a reprimand from the WHO, an erratum was eventually issued, acknowledging that the wrong classification.
For anyone wishing to challenge this report, the following may be of interest.
Background
Myalgic
Encephalomyelitis (ME) has
been recognised
by the World Health Organisation since
1969
as an organic neurological disease, classified under ICD code G93.3.
ME patients report worse pain than patients with rheumatoid
arthritis or multiple sclerosis, conditions in which pain is
recognised as a major symptom (Marshall et al 2010).
ME
has a greater impact on functional status and well being than other
chronic diseases such as Cancer, (Nacul et al 2011). In 1986 Ramsay,
who followed many of those who fell chronically ill during an 955
epidemic for up to 34 years, until he died in 1989 (Hyde 1998),
commented: “the
too facile assumption that such an entity-despite a long series of
cases extending over several decade -can be attributed to
psychological stress is simply untenable.”
There
was a time before the mid-1980' s, when ME was taken so seriously
that an ME Bill was put before Parliament. The Bill required an
annual report to Parliament: ' It
shall be the duty of the Secretary of State (for Health) in every
year to lay before each House of Parliament a report on the progress
that has been made in investigating the causes, effects, incidence
and treatment of the illness known as ME.'
Hansard
(House of Commons) for 23rd February 1988 at columns 167-168 records:
' There
is no doubt that ME is an organic disorder. The sufferers are denied
proper recognition, misdiagnosed, vilified, ridiculed and driven to
great depths of despair.
' (Williams 2010)
Way
before the involvement of the psychiatric lobby ME was properly
seen as the major public health risk that it is. For almost three
decades, the psychiatric lobby despite the failure of scientific
research to reveal any specific biological marker for any psychiatric
diagnostic category, has dismissed the international biomedical
evidence that ME, insisting that
it
is
a mental (behavioural) disorder which
can be cured by graded exercise and “cognitive re-structuring”.
(Williams 2017)
There
are now over 9,000 peer-reviewed articles describing the complex
biomedical pathology of ME, yet this powerful group of psychiatrists,
with "fixed
views"
who "torture
data"
(Vink 2017), continues to believe and assert that ME is an “aberrant
illness belief” and that all patients with ME are really suffering
from a mental illness, ie. somatisation.
Their
so-called "biopsychosocial model" a " prime
example of assumption and opinion-based medicine at a time when
medicine should be evidence-based",
(Vink 2017) is based on the assumption that individuals are suffering
from maladaptive thinking. Their symptoms, the psychiatrists argue,
are "not
symptoms of illness but merely symptoms of deconditioning."
ME is not a Functional Somatic Syndrome (FSS)
A
diagnosis of Functional Somatic Syndrome is a serious matter; the
implications of misdiagnosing a serious neurological illness as a
neurotic illness hardly bear thinking about.(cf Kemp 2012)
Myalgic
Encephalomyelitis (ME) is listed in the International Classification
of Diseases (ICD), chapter 6, under Disorders of Brain at ICD-10 G
93.3. It is not classified as a mental health disorder.
Following
publication of the International Consensus Criteria in 2011, the
Consensus Panel, a group of doctors with over 500 collective years
experience of studying and treating more than 50 000 people with ME,
issued a one stop, user-friendly reference in 2012 known as the
Primer (Carruthers B et al 2012), that specifically targets primary
care physicians and specialists in internal medicine. It very
strongly affirms that ME is not CFS and outlines many underlying
biological abnormalities that are present more often in patients with
ME.
The
involvement of psychiatry in ME, however, has lead to a situation
where physical causes are not sought and even argued against or
positively proscribed. The tests required to prove the disease are
not being widely offered , developed or easily developed. People
with ME are trapped in a cycle where their physical disease is denied
and where this is seen as justification of Functional Somatic
Syndrome label. It is the perpetrators of the psychosocial paradigm
who have helped create this nightmare environment, by their
misinterpretation of ME.
A
“Functional Somatic” interpretation of ME creates a chicken and
egg situation where you have to have the tests to prove you are ill,
but the psychiatrists have denied you those tests , so you will
not have the proof to prove you are ill.
Yet
wanting to have the tests or being concerned about your health,
because of your symptom severity, is seen as "maladaptive
thinking" and proof of Functional Somatic Syndrome; in that
sense a diagnosis of Functional Somatic Syndrome sets up a vicious
self-fulfilling circle, endangering the lives of people with ME,
especially the most severely affected.
In
the current climate patients with ME are massively at risk of having
their physical reality denied.
In
2015 the influential USA Institute of Medicine, stressed that ME is
a medical, not a psychiatric or psychological illness.(IOM 2015)
The
National Institute of Health ( USA) concluded in 2015 that the
criteria the psychiatrists use, the Oxford Criteria are flawed and
should not be used anymore.
Last
year the USA Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, found no
evidentiary basis for the use of CBT/GET in ME.(Johnson 2016)
In
the UK the controversial PACE trial, the largest Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Graded Exercise Therapy (GET) trial for
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) conducted
thus far, has dominated and influenced policy, however recently it
has been exposed as a failure, there was no “recovery” and up to
96% of participants may have had their health adversely affected .
(Vink 2017)
The
ME Association, based upon member’s experience has explicitly
stated that CBT and GET have no role to play in the management of ME
(MEA 2015)
The
25% Group and Stonebird surveys (Crowhurst 2005 and 2007) of the most
severely affected, for example, showed that 95% of members were made
worse by Graded Exercise and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.
In
a joint statement Stonebird and the 25%
Group called for the removal of psychiatry
from front line
involvement in ME.
(25% Group)
ME
has no place in this document.
That
needs raising far and wide.
References
25%
Group Rightly
Outraged
http://www.25megroup.org/info_news.html
Bell
and Lapp (1999). Letter
to the editor of the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Newsletter AAFCFS, Aug/Sep. 1999.
Breakthrough
(Autumn 2012) ME
Research
http://www.meresearch.org.uk/information/breakthrough/Breakthrough_Autumn2012.pdf
Carruthers
B et al (2012) Myalgic
Encephalomyelitis - Adult & PaediatricInternational Consensus
Primer for Medical Practioners International
Consensus Panel
http://www.hetalternatief.org/ICC
primer 2012.pdf
Crowhurst
(2005/7) Severe
ME Patient Surveys
http://stonebird.co.uk/psurvey.pdf
English
(1999)Letters
responding to Wessely et al.
Lancet 1999, 354, 2078-9.
Hyde
B ( 1998) Are
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Synonymous
Terms?
Nightingale Research Foundation Paper Presented by Byron Marshall
Hyde M.D. - New South Wales, February 1998
http://www.nightingale.ca/ICaustralia2.html
Institute
of Medicine(2015) Beyond
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Redefining
an Illness https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK274235/
Johnson
C (2016) Federal
Report Says There’s
(Almost) No Evidence CBT/GET Work in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
(ME/CFS)
https://www.healthrising.org/blog/2016/08/18/federal-report-says-almost-no-evidence-cbtget-work-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-mecfs/
Kemp
P (2012) DSM-5
Somatic Symptoms Work Group submissions 2012: Last chance to tell SSD
Work Group why it needs to ditch flawed, unsafe and unscientific
proposals.
Submission
from Peter Kemp, UK advocate http://dxrevisionwatch.wordpress.com/
Marshall
E, Williams M (2006) INQUEST
IMPLICATIONS?
http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/Inquest_Implications.htm
Marshall
R et al (2010) Pain
Characteristics of People with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
June 2010, Vol. 18, No. 2 , Pages 127-137
(doi:10.3109/10582452.2010.483966) Journal of Journal of
Musculoskeletal Pain
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/10582452.2010.483966
MEA
(2015) “No
decisions about me without me”
http://www.meassociation.org.uk/how-you-can-help/introduction-to-our-cbt-get-and-pacing-report/
Nacul
et al (2011) The
functional status and well being of people with myalgic
encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and their carers. Public
Health. 2011 May 27;11:402
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21619607
Pall
ML(2007) Explaining Unexplained
Illnesses, Disease Paradigm for Chronic fatigue Syndrome , Multiple
Chemical sensitivity, Fibromyalgia, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder,
Gulf War Syndrom and Others Harrington
Park Press, New York and London pp189/90
Vink
M (2017) Assessment
of Individual PACE Trial Data: in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic
Fatigue Syndrome, Cognitive Behavioral and Graded Exercise Therapy
are Ineffective, Do Not Lead to Actual Recovery and Negative Outcomes
may be Higher than Reported.
J Neurol Neurobiol 3(1): doi http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2379-7150.136
Williams
M(2009) ME/CFS:
TERMINOLOGY http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/ME_CFS_TERMINOLOGY.htm
Williams
M (2010) Evidence
that the official UK position is that ME/CFS is a neurological
disorder
http://www.mecfsforums.com/wiki/Evidence_that_the_official_UK_position_is_that_ME/CFS_is_a_neurological_disorder
Wiliams
M(2017) The Power of
Propaganda ?
http://www.margaretwilliams.me/2017/power-of-propaganda.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment